- Flynote
-
Interpretation of contract – between cell phone service provider and dealer
of cell phone products – repudiation – dealer alleged to possess goods not supplied
by service provider – not proved – indemnity clause – dealer not precluded from
recovering damages resulting from repudiation of agreement by service provider –
whether dealer precluded by non-variation clause from including new store under the
agreement – permissible as agreement contains procedure for an amendment due to
changed circumstances – followed by service provider – appeal dismissed.
Loading PDF...
This document is 279.6 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 8
Judgment 8
Documents citing this one 1
Judgment 1
1. | Transnet SOC Limited v Total South Africa (Pty) Limited and Another [2022] ZACC 21 (21 June 2022) | 1 citation |