S v Muunganirwa (HCB 26 of 2003) [2003] ZWBHC 63 (21 May 2003)


2


Judgment No. HB 63/2003

Case No. HCB 26/2003


ISAAC MUUNGANIRWA


Versus


THE STATE


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

CHIWESHE J

BULAWAYO 15 & 22 MAY 2003


M Ncube for the applicant

Mrs M Moya-Matshanga for respondent


Bail Application


CHIWESHE J: The accused faces charges of armed robbery and one


count of attempted murder. He applies for bail pending trial. The state opposes the


application on the grounds inter alia that he is unlikely to stand trial as he is prone to


abscondment. It is alleged he has previously skipped bail and for that reason he is no


longer a suitable candidate for bail. The applicant argues otherwise. He may be


given the benefit of the doubt in that regard as the presumption of innocence operates


in his favour.


However, it is further alleged that the police have had (in an effort to re-arrest


him) to pursue him as far as the Plumtree border post and into Botswana. There he is


alleged to have had an exchange of gunfire with the police, in an attempt to resist


arrest. Mr Ncube initially argued that these events were a fabrication by the police.


When asked to confirm whether in fact his client had been arrested at or near the


border post and or on the Botswana side of the border he said he did not have


instructions on the point. I do not think that Mr Ncube was being candid with the


court. In the end he conceded that his client was indeed arrested at the border post.


Once that concession is made, the conclusion that the applicant attempted to remove


HB 63/03


himself from the jurisdiction of this court is inescapable. He sought to abscond. Such


a person cannot be a proper candidate for bail.


It was for these reasons that the application was dismissed.







Hare & Partners applicant’s legal practitioners

Attorney-General’s Office respondent’s legal practitioners


▲ To the top