|
Direct access denied; applicant’s challenge to Supreme Court judgment raised factual, not constitutional, issues and lacked prospects of success.
Constitutional procedure — Direct access under s 167(5) and r 21(2) — Challenge to a Supreme Court judgment under s 85(1) — Finality of Supreme Court decisions — Requirement to plead a constitutional violation with precision — Fair trial (s 69(1)) and equal protection (s 56(1)) — Liability of co-perpetrators: s 196 and s 196A — Pleading and relief: distinction between s 85 and s 175 remedies.
|