dismissal of application

1) Mashangwa & Anor v Makandiwa & 2 Others 2) Makandiwa & Anor v Mashangwa & Anor (HH 40-19, HC 4197/18 X Ref HC 1774/18) [2019] ZWHHC 40 (23 January 2019);

                                                                                                                     

                                                                                                                    

(1) UPENYU MASHANGWA                                                          HC 4197/18    

and                                                                                                      Ref:  HC 1774/18       

BLESSING MASHANGWA

versus

EMMANUEL MAKANDIWA

and

RUTH MAKANDIWA

and

Pasi & Another v Stalap Investments (Pvt) LTD & 4 Others (HH 271-18, HC 516/18 Ref HC 11164/17) [2018] ZWHHC 271 (23 May 2018);

ITAI VALERIE PASI

and

WILLOUGHBY’S INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD

versus

STALAP INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD       

and

ZIMRE HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD

and

DOUGLAS MAMVURA

and

RAMSWAY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD

and

CFI HOLDINGS LIMITED

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MUZOFA J

HARARE, 30 April 2018 and 23 May 2018

 

 

Opposed Matter

 

ABC Chinake, for the applicants

T. Mpofu, for the respondents

 

Ziyambi v Laryscope Healthcare (Pvt) Ltd (HH295-18, HC 4467/16) [2018] ZWHHC 295 (06 June 2018);

 

 

GODFREY ZIYAMBI

versus

LARYSCOPE HEALTHCARE (PVT) LTD

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MUZOFA J

HARARE, 14 May 2018 & 6 June 2018

 

 

Opposed Matter

 

 

O. D Mawadze, for the applicant

Matsanhura, for the respondent

 

 

            MUZOFA J:  This chamber application is made in terms of r 236 (4) (b) of the High Court Rules, 1971 for registration of an arbitral award.

Mbangani v Mabhena (HB 93-18, HC 3274/17) [2018] ZWBHC 93 (29 March 2018);

EDMUND MBANGANI

versus

SAMUKELISO MABHENA

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MOYO J

BULAWAYO 21 MARCH 2018 AND 29 MARCH 2018

Opposed Matter

Ms P Mvundla for the applicant

Z C Ncube for the respondent

            MOYO J:       This is an application in terms of order 11 rule 75 wherein applicant seeks the dismissal of the respondent’s case in HC 3196/17 as being frivolous and vexatious.  At the hearing of the matter, I dismissed it.  Here are my detailed reasons.

Subscribe to dismissal of application