Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe - 2019

10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 2019
Confirmation of the High Court’s invalidation of s 93(5A) denied because the applicant lacked standing and the declaration would have no practical effect.
Constitutional law — confirmation of lower-court declaration of invalidity — locus and practical effect — statutory interpretation of s 93(5A) Labour Act — standing and requirement to show injury by impugned provision.
3 July 2019
April 2019
Judicial corporal punishment of male juveniles violates the constitutional prohibition on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and is struck down.
Constitutional law — prohibition of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment — judicial corporal punishment of male juveniles — human dignity — section 53 — confirmation of invalidity — CRC/ICCPR jurisprudence — juvenile justice principles; alternatives to corporal punishment.
3 April 2019
March 2019
A Constitutional Court will not entertain direct review of a Supreme Court non‑constitutional decision based on mere alleged wrongness; interests of justice required.
Constitutional law – direct access under s85(1) – scope and limits – interests of justice and r21(3)/(8) – finality of Supreme Court decisions on non‑constitutional matters – stare decisis – equality/equal protection (s56) – wrongness of decision does not equal constitutional breach.
13 March 2019
Direct access refused: merits determination by subordinate court precludes s175(4) referral complaint; appeal is the appropriate remedy.
Constitutional procedure – s 175(4) referral of constitutional questions – distinction between refusal to refer and merits determination; Direct access – s 85(1) – subsidiarity and appeal as proper remedy; Prosecutorial authority – CP&E Act s 5(2) permits Prosecutor-General to appoint any legal practitioner; Equal protection – s 56(1) – not engaged where subordinate court decided merits.
6 March 2019
February 2019
27 February 2019
Application dismissed for lack of constitutional issue and failure to comply with rules requiring identification of a constitutional matter.
Constitutional jurisdiction – right of appeal to Constitutional Court – appeal lies only where a constitutional matter was raised and decided below – Rules 32(2) and 32(3)(c) – procedural compliance required for leave to appeal – non-constitutional Supreme Court decision not appealable to Constitutional Court.
27 February 2019
Leave to appeal denied where no subordinate court decision on a constitutional matter existed due to the applicant's withdrawal.
Constitutional jurisdiction; leave to appeal r 32(2)-(3); requirement of subordinate court decision on constitutional matter; withdrawal of proceedings not a court decision; no appeal against withdrawal.
27 February 2019
Leave to appeal dismissed: no constitutional issue was decided by the Supreme Court, so no appeal to the Constitutional Court lies.
Constitutional jurisdiction – right of appeal to Constitutional Court – appeal lies only where Supreme Court determined a constitutional issue – subordinate court labour disputes as non-constitutional matters – r 32(3)(c) requirement to identify constitutional matter – s 169(1) and s 167(5) implications.
27 February 2019
Employment of serving security-service members as prosecutors breaches s208(4); NPA must disengage them within twenty-four months.
Constitutional law – separation of security services and civilian institutions – s208(4) – definition of "civilian" – National Prosecuting Authority a civilian institution – employment of serving security officers as prosecutors unconstitutional absent public emergency – suspension of invalidity to avoid disruption.
19 February 2019
Referral under s175(4) must arise from established facts; improper referral without opposing affidavit was struck off the roll.
Constitutional law – s 175(4) referral – referral must arise from facts before referring court – magistrate must consider merits and make factual findings – Magistrates' Court Rules require opposing affidavit when denying facts in application – occupation of gazetted land requires lawful authority (offer letter/permit/land settlement lease) – eviction proceedings – referral frivolous/vexatious – matter struck off roll.
18 February 2019