Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Collections
Academic papers
Academic papers
Journals
Journals
Books
Books
Gazettes
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe
Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe - 2019
10 judgments
Advanced search
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
All months
February
March
April
July
All months
February
March
April
July
Filters
Filters
Judges
Bere JCC
Bhunu JCC
Chidyausiku CJ
Garwe JCC
Gowora JCC
Guvava JA
Guvava JCC
Gwaunza JCC
Hlatshwayo JCC
Makarau JCC
Makoni AJCC
Makoni JCC
Malaba CJ
Malaba DCJ
Mavangira AJCC
Mavangira JCC
Patel JA
Patel JCC
Uchena JCC
Ziyambi JCC
Topics
Appeals
Land
Land use
Locus standi in environmental litigation
Minerals and energy
Mining Law
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 2019
Makumire v Minister, Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare & Anor (CCZ 1 of 2020; Constitutional Application CCZ 21 of 2019) [2019] ZWCC 1 (3 July 2019)
Confirmation of the High Court’s invalidation of s 93(5A) denied because the applicant lacked standing and the declaration would have no practical effect.
Constitutional law — confirmation of lower-court declaration of invalidity — locus and practical effect — statutory interpretation of s 93(5A) Labour Act — standing and requirement to show injury by impugned provision.
3 July 2019
April 2019
S v Chokuramba Justice For Children’s Trust Intervening As Amicus Curiae Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights Intervening As Amicus Curiae (CCZ 10 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 29 of 2015) [2019] ZWCC 10 (3 April 2019)
Judicial corporal punishment of male juveniles violates the constitutional prohibition on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and is struck down.
Constitutional law — prohibition of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment — judicial corporal punishment of male juveniles — human dignity — section 53 — confirmation of invalidity — CRC/ICCPR jurisprudence — juvenile justice principles; alternatives to corporal punishment.
3 April 2019
March 2019
Denhere v Denhere & Anor (CCZ 9 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 55 of 2017) [2019] ZWCC 9 (13 March 2019)
A Constitutional Court will not entertain direct review of a Supreme Court non‑constitutional decision based on mere alleged wrongness; interests of justice required.
Constitutional law – direct access under s85(1) – scope and limits – interests of justice and r21(3)/(8) – finality of Supreme Court decisions on non‑constitutional matters – stare decisis – equality/equal protection (s56) – wrongness of decision does not equal constitutional breach.
13 March 2019
Nyagura v Lanzani Ncube N.O. & Ors (CCZ 7 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 53 of 2018) [2019] ZWCC 7 (6 March 2019)
Direct access refused: merits determination by subordinate court precludes s175(4) referral complaint; appeal is the appropriate remedy.
Constitutional procedure – s 175(4) referral of constitutional questions – distinction between refusal to refer and merits determination; Direct access – s 85(1) – subsidiarity and appeal as proper remedy; Prosecutorial authority – CP&E Act s 5(2) permits Prosecutor-General to appoint any legal practitioner; Equal protection – s 56(1) – not engaged where subordinate court decided merits.
6 March 2019
February 2019
Bonnyview Estate (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe Platinum Mine (Pvt) Ltd & Anor (CCZ 6 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 54 of 2018) [2019] ZWCC 6 (27 February 2019)
27 February 2019
Mudyavanhu v Saruchera & Ors (CCZ 3 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 22 of 2018) [2019] ZWCC 3 (27 February 2019)
Application dismissed for lack of constitutional issue and failure to comply with rules requiring identification of a constitutional matter.
Constitutional jurisdiction – right of appeal to Constitutional Court – appeal lies only where a constitutional matter was raised and decided below – Rules 32(2) and 32(3)(c) – procedural compliance required for leave to appeal – non-constitutional Supreme Court decision not appealable to Constitutional Court.
27 February 2019
Muza v Saruchera N.O. & Ors (CCZ 5 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 32 of 2018) [2019] ZWCC 5 (27 February 2019)
Leave to appeal denied where no subordinate court decision on a constitutional matter existed due to the applicant's withdrawal.
Constitutional jurisdiction; leave to appeal r 32(2)-(3); requirement of subordinate court decision on constitutional matter; withdrawal of proceedings not a court decision; no appeal against withdrawal.
27 February 2019
Nkomo & Anor v T.M. Supermarkets (Pvt) Ltd (CCZ 4 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 30 of 2018) [2019] ZWCC 4 (27 February 2019)
Leave to appeal dismissed: no constitutional issue was decided by the Supreme Court, so no appeal to the Constitutional Court lies.
Constitutional jurisdiction – right of appeal to Constitutional Court – appeal lies only where Supreme Court determined a constitutional issue – subordinate court labour disputes as non-constitutional matters – r 32(3)(c) requirement to identify constitutional matter – s 169(1) and s 167(5) implications.
27 February 2019
Zimbabwe Law Officers Association & Anor v NPA & Ors (CCZ 1 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 32 of 2014) [2019] ZWCC 1 (19 February 2019)
Employment of serving security-service members as prosecutors breaches s208(4); NPA must disengage them within twenty-four months.
Constitutional law – separation of security services and civilian institutions – s208(4) – definition of "civilian" – National Prosecuting Authority a civilian institution – employment of serving security officers as prosecutors unconstitutional absent public emergency – suspension of invalidity to avoid disruption.
19 February 2019
Muhala & 50 Ors v Mukorera (CCZ 118 of 2013; CCZ 2 of 2019) [2019] ZWCC 2 (18 February 2019)
Referral under s175(4) must arise from established facts; improper referral without opposing affidavit was struck off the roll.
Constitutional law – s 175(4) referral – referral must arise from facts before referring court – magistrate must consider merits and make factual findings – Magistrates' Court Rules require opposing affidavit when denying facts in application – occupation of gazetted land requires lawful authority (offer letter/permit/land settlement lease) – eviction proceedings – referral frivolous/vexatious – matter struck off roll.
18 February 2019
1
>