|
Appellant rebutted statutory presumption of intent; conviction for criminal abuse of office set aside due to lack of mens rea.
Criminal abuse of office – mens rea (intention) – reverse onus under s 174(2) – burden to rebut presumption on balance of probabilities – actus reus must be proved beyond reasonable doubt; detention powers under s 201 Customs and Excise Act; material inconsistencies in State evidence undermining inference of malice.
|