Supreme Court of Zimbabwe - 2004 November

3 judgments
  • Filters
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
3 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2004
Whether a municipal defendant, though a contract may be void for tender non‑compliance, was unjustly enriched by extraction of applicant’s gravel and liable in restitution.
Contract formation – implied/tacit agreement; Municipal procurement/tenders – effect of non-compliance with s 211 Urban Councils Act on enforceability; Restitution – unjust enrichment elements (enrichment, impoverishment, lack of justification, measure of enrichment); Remedy – restitution despite invalid contract
22 November 2004
Appeal struck off roll: contract duration was a factual issue, not a question of law, so no Supreme Court jurisdiction.
Labour law — retrenchment regulations — fixed-term versus open-ended contracts — question of law v question of fact — appellate jurisdiction under s 92(2) Labour Relations Act — appeal struck off roll
15 November 2004
A consent order cannot be appealed; under s92D appeals lie only on questions of law and consent orders present no such issues.
Civil procedure – Consent orders – Appealability of judgments by consent – Consent orders not subject to appeal; may only be set aside for fraud or common mistake; Labour Relations Act s92D limits appeals to questions of law
4 November 2004