|
Whether a municipal defendant, though a contract may be void for tender non‑compliance, was unjustly enriched by extraction of applicant’s gravel and liable in restitution.
Contract formation – implied/tacit agreement; Municipal procurement/tenders – effect of non-compliance with s 211 Urban Councils Act on enforceability; Restitution – unjust enrichment elements (enrichment, impoverishment, lack of justification, measure of enrichment); Remedy – restitution despite invalid contract
|
22 November 2004 |